bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25891: 25.2; Reply inRMAIL sometimes fails


From: jpff
Subject: bug#25891: 25.2; Reply inRMAIL sometimes fails
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:34:26 +0100

Attached is a mailfile (set rail-mode) with one message.  Typing "r" to
reply I see
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jpff <jpff@codemist.co.uk>
To: Steven Yi <stevenyi@gmail.com>
CC: Victor.Lazzarini@mu.ie
In-reply-to:
        <CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com>
        (message from Steven Yi on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:39:00 -0400)
Subject: Re: Next release
BCC: jpff@codemist.co.uk
References: <9c571770-2e28-4b78-95c6-baad81925043@codemist.co.uk> 
<63268264-9DE9-4EDE-AE92-BC3236D5A1FF@mu.ie> 
<CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com>
--text follows this line--

==John ffitch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(that is my automatically inserted signature)

Adding text `"test" to this and sending the message I get (my BCC) is
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:13:14 +0100
From: jpff <jpff@codemist.co.uk>
To: Steven Yi <stevenyi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Victor.Lazzarini@mu.ie"
    <CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next release

test
==John ffitch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
which is clearly ill formed -- and indeed I also get the message
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:13:51 +0100
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@codemist.co.uk>
To: jpff@codemist.co.uk
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Parts/Attachments:
   1   Shown      8 lines  Text
   2   Shown    161 bytes  Message, "Delivery Status"
   3   Shown    1.2 KB     Message, "Re: Next release"
   3.1 Shown      3 lines  Text
----------------------------------------

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com
    Unknown user


    [ Part 2: "Delivery Status" ]

Reporting-MTA: dns; codemist.co.uk

Action: failed
Final-Recipient:
rfc822;CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com
Status: 5.0.0



    [ Part 3: "Included Message" ]

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:13:14 +0100
From: jpff <jpff@codemist.co.uk>
To: Steven Yi <stevenyi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Victor.Lazzarini@mu.ie"
    <CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next release

test
==John ffitch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experiments suggest that if I move the I-reply-to lines to the end of
the headers it works

Hope that is clear?

==John ffitch
>From stevenyi@gmail.com Tue Sep 19 13:39:11 2017
Return-path: <stevenyi@gmail.com>
Envelope-to: jpff@codemist.co.uk
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:39:11 +0100
Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176])
        by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <stevenyi@gmail.com>)
        id 1duHnw-0003CK-0F
        for jpff@codemist.co.uk; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:39:11 +0100
Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u73so3381121qkl.12
        for <jpff@codemist.co.uk>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8MuFyT7LUs5SX5yq6pTgOzsE10Bne0HSUCLixuvD1uw=;
        b=IzVdP3t2tJi6tMPQMVFY+X3b3e3rASEE0OebZPXSj5YJjvgRN5pfpoRiJ7VNf+VcPg
         6djP+y2hqBEpnQxNO/rXRZhKXqgiG8pGx/Jipmi2JaWQp2CjWENE8s5bbZqn4Vxw4MdD
         UXkV89VWKJQgfFCRmK7NDyBx+tmhFaPDQkL1ZOQQ6XStQzgfLCEDjU6Urb0KCTCGYCNw
         U5jV2wSFAFGMm4dcf2nV3p+oHkR1o3PAFG57013KwMSNYwBRGxMXJ320g/CxrEzRx36Y
         Vb4DREZpvIoONlMJI9v3qefYScH5ImqfcGr4tgV8/Omp/P1nN3CLaoFzUuTCidKt8Zg9
         P2lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8MuFyT7LUs5SX5yq6pTgOzsE10Bne0HSUCLixuvD1uw=;
        b=has5CAbHtrDmSz8tNWeoBZIFiiyn5R4r2HEWSHaLKFcrAQuYvrf1n3gMealACyI2Cc
         S5mF8Ccs34DsyNidA8PBUo+v7m7YQqestpZmr7/r07tVppijRyv08URQG7w9o+WtcNP4
         C9RoU6OJkUNLBLcmq2QUgJ1z6G7cqtDF61arI0EKcZols5qo0hCAWy33pwFvhV3NOEON
         jnkflnTbZ4iH6ktDgKltdI3hieI+nVW4GW799TrX6OlBjDCtqtL7Ase9YTVMogrJ/OzR
         s1Ygnm05cOcrc5KchCaSWm/zB50Bpxa5846SvuBggf+eINxnqCJPCB9jBk+O2AHh2oEO
         feUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhqini2aBFhx6Tc7mt8BfFu8Ic8ijXHV72KD9ArztoVUYYKCkws
        enJ9eAYcs3ZYqHE4VmpcyV5NeEpr25VFH8hVIbg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: 
AOwi7QBFLmZtLwH9ADA4Jhgms92h3p8nHe5qjAFXlWR7F4jMuhfNs9sawI/gpouF7iyOn3h8iSnj63tS0TPEmIaaCNs=
X-Received: by 10.55.40.152 with SMTP id o24mr1657482qko.235.1505824741132;
 Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.108.98 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <63268264-9DE9-4EDE-AE92-BC3236D5A1FF@mu.ie>
References: <9c571770-2e28-4b78-95c6-baad81925043@codemist.co.uk> 
<63268264-9DE9-4EDE-AE92-BC3236D5A1FF@mu.ie>
From: Steven Yi <stevenyi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:39:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CANtcCs7-TwLw9PiOvQBYyertQbWurCsJ-i9B9JjGQTZxoaNesg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next release
To: Victor Lazzarini <Victor.Lazzarini@mu.ie>
Cc: John ff <jpff@codemist.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
Content-Length: 1831
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 8771
X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: --------

Wow that is quite an upgrade adventure!

I think we still have the issue with reverting the changes for
if-then?  (Or has that been done?)  I've been a bit heads down
preparing for the conference and getting final changes done for a Blue
release.  I still see changes coming in from Michael for the Appveyor
build so I suppose we need to coordinate with him on that.

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Victor Lazzarini
<Victor.Lazzarini@mu.ie> wrote:
> I=E2=80=99d say a couple of things:
>
> 1) Menno=E2=80=99s issue
> 2) Eduardo=E2=80=99s PR
>
> and we should be OK.
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Prof. Victor Lazzarini
> Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy,
> Maynooth University,
> Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland
> Tel: 00 353 7086936
> Fax: 00 353 1 7086952
>
>> On 19 Sep 2017, at 13:14, John ff <jpff@codemist.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Just checking back in.  I have been having local problems.  Printer stop=
ped working so lost a day failing to get the replacement to work.  Eventual=
ly realised that I needed newer software which requires OS upgrade.  Spent =
most of Sunday upgrading my server/firewall from Debian wheezy to Jessie, o=
n the way to stretch.  Disaster struck when the Jessie failed to reboot.  A=
s the computer is headless I had to dismantle it all, loose the internet, a=
nd find USB keyboard and dvi cable for screen.  Eventually discovered that =
the kernel installed with Jessie did not load, but the previous kernel did.=
  An hour or so thinking and I managed to get autobooting to work so re-ins=
talled with internet and hidden location.... , and eventually email resumed=
.
>>
>> What are the stoppers to release?  I did look at Meno's ladspa problem b=
ut that is outside my current knowledge.
>>
>> z=3D=3DJohn
>> =E2=81=A3Sent from TypeApp
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]