bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24

[Stefan Monnier]

>> (And if we’re going to make that sort of thing an error, we should
>> probably check whether empty &key or &aux variable lists are similarly
>> rejected.  I haven’t looked.)

I recently installed a patch to fix/improve the behavior of &aux with no
keyword variable (I bumped into it while working on some Elisp package,
tho I can't remember which right now).

I think it's usually worth the small extra effort to support &optional
not followed by any var (as well as &aux not followed by any var) since
it sometimes comes in handy.  But not if it costs extra at run-time.

> Updated patch which handles &aux as well.  I also tested a bootstrap
> (doing this I found the previous patch messed up some positive cases).

To the extent that &aux is only handled by macro-expansion, accepting an
empty &aux never costs anything at run-time, so I think rejecting it is
a disservice to our users.


        Stefan