[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 09:25:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>> Cc: 29785@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:33 +0100
>>
>> >> As currently proposed, no. But if I enabled the separate history
>> >> unconditionally then it would.
>> >
>> > No, it won't. M-p and M-n would still work as they did before.
>>
>> The history list they would cycle through would be the eww history
>> list, not the global minibuffer history list. What am I missing?
>
> You don't miss anything. I'm saying that user-visible behavior won't
> change, as users don't care where the history is stored. Therefore, a
> defcustom, which is by definition for users and not for developers, is
> not needed, at least not IMO.
OK. I'll just enable stuff and wait for the inevitable fallout.
Robert
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history,
Robert Pluim <=
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20