|Subject:||bug#29220: 26.0.90; eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.|
|Date:||Sun, 25 Feb 2018 01:34:44 +0100|
|User-agent:||Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.91 (gnu/linux)|
Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes: > On 02/25/18 00:21 AM, Pierre Téchoueyres wrote: >> Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes: >> >>> address@hidden (Pierre Téchoueyres) writes: >>> >>>> Hello Eric, >>>> Any news on this fix ? >>> >>> Hey, sorry again this is taking so long. I wanted to run CEDET's test >>> suite, as that seems to be the main library that relies on >>> eieio-persistent, and I wanted to make sure it passed with these >>> changes. I can't get CEDET to build on my machine, however (apparently >>> Arch has a too-new version of ImageMagick, and CEDET won't build against >>> it), and I haven't had any luck just faking it and running the tests >>> themselves -- everything's too dependent on a successful build. >>> >>> I've only got two Arch machines to play with -- if anyone could >>> successfully build and test CEDET using the fix/eieio-persistent branch, >>> that would be very helpful... >>> >> >> I've been able to run the "itest-batch" and "utest-batch" from the CEDET >> git repository (http://git.code.sf.net/p/cedet/git), but I don't know >> how to interpret the results. Whatever the emacs version I use (25.3 or >> 26.0.91 + fix), I get errors. So I don't know what to check for the >> fix/eieio-persistent branch. > > Bah, this is annoyingly difficult -- thank you for trying it out. I > suppose one terrible heuristic would be if the errors were different > between emacs-25, emacs-26, and fix/eieio-persistent. Would you mind > sending me the error output, in case anything jumps out at me? > Hope this could help you.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|