bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode'

[Noam Postavsky]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> I disagree. The interpreter and byte compiler do not care about the
>> indentation style that you choose for your code: the syntax and
>> semantics are unaffected.
>> 
>> Style choices should not produce warnings. An indication that code layout
>> is following an unusual style may be useful, but it should be optional, and
>> it should not use the warning face (it should have a separate face that can
>> be customised independently of the warning face).
>
> What Andy said.  This has nothing to do with byte-compiling
> (or interpreting, for that matter).

I don't understand why you guys are all of a sudden talking about
byte-compiling.

> It should be easy for users to give the face(s) used for
> stylistic highlighting different appearance(s) from standard
> Emacs faces that have other meanings.

Anyway, if this just about reorganizing the faces used, I have no
objections.