[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry
From: |
Alex Branham |
Subject: |
bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:07:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
On Tue 07 Aug 2018 at 04:19, Basil L. Contovounesios <contovob@tcd.ie> wrote:
> Are these commands (or could they be made) suitable for use with
> beginning-of-defun-function and end-of-defun-function, as discussed in
> the following messages?
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-05/msg00820.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-05/msg00821.html
Thanks for bringing those to my attention; I don't subscribe to emacs-devel.
We could certainly modify bibtex-beginning-of-entry to take an optional
argument that allows it to move past the current entry if point is
already at the beginning. I wouldn't want to modify the current behavior
because other packages rely on bibtex-beginning/end-of-entry not to move
past the current one (e.g. bibtex-completion.el and org-ref.el).
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, (continued)
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Noam Postavsky, 2018/08/12
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Alex Branham, 2018/08/20
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Noam Postavsky, 2018/08/20
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Alex Branham, 2018/08/21
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Alex Branham, 2018/08/21
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Noam Postavsky, 2018/08/27
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/20
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Alex Branham, 2018/08/21
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/21
bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2018/08/07
- bug#32378: [PATCH] bibtex-next/previous-entry,
Alex Branham <=