[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More about my report and possible fix
From: |
Hans-Bernhard Broeker |
Subject: |
Re: More about my report and possible fix |
Date: |
29 Jan 2001 17:32:46 GMT |
address@hidden wrote:
> Ok, I have found a fix (not the FIX). There is definitly something wrong
> in coffgen.c. In function coff_find_nearest_line the check for dwarf2
> debugging info is suspicious. Here a simple patch (not right) that does
> fix the problem reported.
Hmm... your patch essentially forbids finding any Dwarf2 debugging
info. Doesn't feel like a valid way of fixing this, to me.
It might be better to first check out what type of debugging info the
program actually does contain, or what type of debugging info the
binutils expect to find. I.e., do you get linenumbers in output if you:
*) compile and link with -gstabs
*) compile and link with -gcoff
*) compile and link with -gdwarf-2
?
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (address@hidden)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.