[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: grep patch |
Date: |
18 Jan 2002 10:38:07 +0900 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> No, you've got it backwards. grep didn't have -r for many years, but
> many ordinary users kept asking for it, so it got added to grep. As
> far as I know you are the only one who's ever asked for anything like
> --fake-filename.
...but certainly not the only one who's _wanted_ it.
[One reason why it's nice to have a flag like that instead of using
sed on the output is that it can be easily applied to both normal
output and error messages, without forcing the wrapper to merge them
into a single stream.]
-Miles
--
Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen
- grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Andreas Schwab, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Paul Eggert, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Paul Eggert, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch, Paul Eggert, 2002/01/17
- Re: grep patch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: grep patch, Paul Eggert, 2002/01/18
- Re: grep patch, Miles Bader, 2002/01/18
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/18
- Re: grep patch, Alain Magloire, 2002/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/18
- Re: grep patch, Andreas Schwab, 2002/01/18
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/19
- Re: grep patch, Miles Bader, 2002/01/19
- Re: grep patch, Stepan Koltsov, 2002/01/19
- Re: grep patch, Kris Warkentin, 2002/01/18