[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: grep patch |
Date: |
18 Jan 2002 21:40:01 +0900 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> does what you want and is obviously cleaner than the --fake-filename
> approach. I guess I'd have to see a real example to see what people
> are driving at.
I think it's intended for things like `zgrep'; currently, zgrep filters
grep's output with sed to do the same thing. As far as I can see,
there's no particular problem with this -- since grep doesn't try to
open any files (gzip does), it never outputs an error message with a
filename, so there's no need to filter stderr (unless there's some error
I don't know about). Other applications that report things like syntax
errors with the filename in the error message would need extra work to
work right.
-Miles
--
Would you like fries with that?
Re: grep patch, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer, 2002/01/18
Re: grep patch, Paul Eggert, 2002/01/18