Re: Makefile.in.in improvement

[Bruno Haible]

Jim Meyering writes:

> The first just factors out some duplication.

Thanks, but I don't think this patch makes the Makefile easier to
understand.

> The second is more important in that it prevents
> a failure of msgfmt or gmsgfmt from resulting in
> corrupt Makefile targets.

I don't see the point of this patch because nothing in the
Makefile.in.in uses this .po.mo rule. But anyway, it makes it more
robust. Thanks, applied.

Bruno