[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?)
From: |
martin f krafft |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?) |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:50:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
also sprach Santiago Vila <address@hidden> [2002.06.10.1514 +0200]:
> It does if you set it up that way. Think of a symlink of the form
> foo -> foo.`date +%Y%m%d` for example. This is a *completely* legitimate
> use of a symlink, and we should not break it just for fun.
>
> I repeat: It's the uudecode command that is "dangerous", as well as
> "cp", "rm" or just redirection, not the usage of symlinks or pipes.
This I dig. However, other tools, like gunzip replace pipes and
symlinks rather than following them. So at the very least, it's not
standardized across GNU tools.
> I'm sorry, but this bug will remain wishlist until I hear from the
> authors.
I'll leave it closed for now, although I am not quite in agreement
yet.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" address@hidden
"i've got a bike,
you can ride it if you like,
it's got a basket. a bell that rings, and things to make it look good.
i'd give it to you if i could,
but i borrowed it."
-- syd barrett, 1967
pgptKMW8siWqy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?),
martin f krafft <=
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), Santiago Vila, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), martin f krafft, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), Andreas Schwab, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), martin f krafft, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), Paul Eggert, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), martin f krafft, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), Paul Eggert, 2002/07/09
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), martin f krafft, 2002/07/10
- Re: Bug#149454: uudecode bug (?), Paul Eggert, 2002/07/10