Re: reported a iconv improvement and now feel bad

[Paul Eggert]

> From: Dan Jacobson <address@hidden>
> Date: 13 Jul 2002 06:42:06 +0800
> 
> P> Your suggestion is quite reasonable, but I suspect that your bet isn't
> P> quite correct.  (The best way to settle the bet is to write the patch.  :-)
> 
> how about it reporting what argument it ran into trouble?  Certainly
> it uses them one by one?

I'm afraid not.  Try running the command "man iconv_open" for more info.

> P.S. I don't think you want me coding your programs, unless you want
> comp.risks headlines.

Perhaps you can find someone else who can write the patch, then.
I think you made a nice suggestion, but the maintainers are a bit
shorthanded and I doubt whether the patch is trivial.