Re: gawk compl()

[Karel Zak]

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 09:29 -0400, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> Hi Karel,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > $ gawk 'BEGIN {printf("%#x\n", compl(0xFFFF0000)) }'
> > 0x1fffff0000ffff
> > 
> > I see same output for 3.1.5, 3.1.4 and 3.1.3. It seems that version
> > 3.1.2 returns correct output (it means 0xffff).
> 
> Actually, the code seems to be working correctly.  Your code

>From my point of view it's regression between version 3.1.2 and >=3.1.3.
It means the code (or docs) is incorrect :-)

        Karel

-- 
Karel Zak <address@hidden>