[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: might be a bug in gawk
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: might be a bug in gawk |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:02:49 +0300 |
Hi. Thanks to you and all the respondents about this topic.
I have added lint warnings to gawk for the cases here: field width
and/or precision with %%, and unknown control letter (%b). They
will show up in the gawk-stable CVS very soon.
Arnold
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:58:29 -0400
> From: "joanes.polus" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: might be a bug in gawk
>
> hello,
>
> execution of:
>
> echo "a%28b%29%c"|awk -F "a" '{printf $2}'
>
> give this result:
>
> %28b%c
>
> and not
>
> %28b%29%c
>
> So may be a bug or i do not understand something in awk.
>
> Bye.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> System:
> Archlinux 2008
>
> Hardware:
> Linux 2.6.28-ARCH
> i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, (continued)
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Andrew J. Schorr, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Dave B, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Andreas Schwab, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Dave B, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Andreas Schwab, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Micah Cowan, 2009/03/25
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Dave B, 2009/03/26
- Re: might be a bug in gawk, Micah Cowan, 2009/03/25
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Jean-Michel ELYN, 2009/03/26
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Pierre Gaston, 2009/03/26
Re: might be a bug in gawk,
Aharon Robbins <=
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Aharon Robbins, 2009/03/27
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Aharon Robbins, 2009/03/28