[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:38:10 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:01:31 -0700
> From: Bruce Korb <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> I've hacked tests/shar-1:
Thanks.
> > Here are the changes:
>
> I don't have time to digest this part of the patch,
> other than to suggest:
>
> #if HAVE_WORKING_FORK
> #elif defined(__MINGW32__)
> #else
> #endif
It's up to you, I don't mind either way. I just didn't want to assume
that the only platform which !HAVE_WORKING_FORK is MinGW. But if
that's a safe assumption, it's fine with me.
> I also haven't investigated, but I worry about adding the uuencode
> command when HAVE_WORKING_FORK is zero. It changes the
> printf arguments and I think the uuencode gets added on
> anyhow, so wouldn't it be redundant? Dunno. Haven't looked yet.
I'm not sure I'm following. When you do have time, please tell more.
> Anyway, forcing the pipe when fork doesn't work cancels out the
> --no-piping option, so this definitely needs some massaging.
Right, forgot about that.
- Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, (continued)
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/07
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/08
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, Bruce Korb, 2013/04/08
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/08
Re: Building sharutils 4.13.4 with MinGW, Bruce Korb, 2013/04/11