bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and2-sid


From: Nardy Pillards
Subject: Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and2-sided?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:08:20 +0100

This is what I get from that build:


 * On disk 1-sided bearoff database evaluator:
   - generated by GNU Backgammon
   - up to 15 chequers on 10 points (3268760 positions) per player
   - database includes gammon distributions
   - number of reads: 0
 * In memory 1-sided bearoff database evaluator:
   - generated by GNU Backgammon
   - up to 15 chequers on 6 points (54264 positions) per player
   - database includes gammon distributions
   - number of reads: 0
 * On disk 2-sided bearoff database evaluator:
   - generated by GNU Backgammon
   - up to 8 chequers on 6 points (3003 positions) per player
   - database includes both cubeful and cubeless equities
   - number of reads: 0
 * In memory 2-sided bearoff database evaluator:
   - generated by GNU Backgammon
   - up to 6 chequers on 6 points (924 positions) per player
   - database includes both cubeful and cubeless equities
   - number of reads: 0

Nardy

(the 70MB gnubg_ts.bd and 118 MB gnubg_os.bd bearoff dbs created with
makebearoff here)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ned Cross" <address@hidden>
To: "Joern Thyssen" <address@hidden>
Cc: "gnubg" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided
and2-sided?


>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:01:11AM -0800, Ned Cross wrote
> > > Running GNUBG build 12/12/2002 on WinME.
> > >
> > > It appears from the output listed by GNUBG that it is not seeing the
> large 1-sided bearoff db, just the two in memory and the large version of
> the 2-sided db.
> > >
> > > Am I reading this correctly?  Do I need to regenerate (makebearoff)
the
> 1-sided db?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bearoff Database files in the GNUBG directory:
> > > gnubg_ts0.bd(12/1/2002); gnubg_os10.bd(12/4/2002);
> > > gnubg_os0.bd(12/7/2002); gnubg_ts.bd(12/4/2002).
> >
> > gnubg_ts0.bd and gnubg_os0.bd  are read into memory.
> >
> > gnubg_ts.bd and gnubg_os.bd are read from disk.
> >
> > Jørn
>
>    That's what I thought from reading gnubg's output from
> amalysis/evaluation engine.   However, the program is not telling me it's
> reading any gnubg_os.bd from disk.
>
> Ned
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]