Re: [Bug-gnubg] Beaver/redouble bug - erase analysis

[Joern Thyssen]

On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 11:57:20AM -0200, Albert Silver wrote
> There's good news and there's bad news. The good news is that with the
> latest 12/24 build, it no longer complains of my lack of doubling. The
> bad news is that it now places 2 question marks on its own beaver as a
> blunder. Now it seems to think (I'm guessing) in its analysis that it
> didn't beaver, keeping the cube, but redoubled. That's the only
> explanation I have for its own attribution of a blunder. 

I've added some code so gnubg doesn't do any analysis of beavers
and raccoons -- well, almost: it still mis-analyses the take decision
after a raccoon.

> 
> BTW, I had to go through a bit of work to do this since I found no way
> to erase the previous analysis. This is a good idea for a function - as
> some people may wish to re-analyze matches with future improved versions
> for comparison. 

I've added commands for clearing the analysis.

Jørn