Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs

bug-gnubg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs

From:	Joseph Heled
Subject:	Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:17:09 +1200
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Well, those are matches, not games. They are played in pairs, withmatching (swapped) dice, on a per game basis. How much this reduces theSTD I have no idea.

For a 0.12% difference you would need more than 1,000,000 games.

Jørn

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Nardy Pillards, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Øystein Johansen, 2003/08/29
  - Re: [Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Joseph Heled, 2003/08/29
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
    - [Bug-gnubg] The importance of METs, Albert Silver, 2003/08/29
    - [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled, 2003/08/29
    - [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joseph Heled <=
    - Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] mec26 MET - source file?, Joseph Heled, 2003/08/29

Prev by Date: Re: Réf. . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?
Next by Date: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph
Previous by thread: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
Next by thread: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread