bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?


From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:55:03 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Holger wrote
> At 19:21 04.09.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Holger wrote
> below.
> 
> >> >No, you should compare the value with aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ].
> >>
> >> Just to confirm whether I understood: aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] should
> >> equal arDouble[ OUTPUT_OPTIMAL ] ?
> >
> >No, the aaarPoints array contains the game winning chance at the various
> >points, so the test should be something like:
> 
> No, you misunderstood. Sorry for not being clear. I didn't mean what I have 
> to compare. I was just asking whether the statement above is true. I 
> figured out the logic below from your last mail.

Still, arDouble contains normalised cubeful equities and aarOutput[ 0 ][
OUTPUT_WIN ] is a cubeless gwc, so you should *never* compare these.

JØrn

Attachment: pgprvZewRbjTv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]