bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Marked move characters su ggestion


From: Massimiliano . Maini
Subject: Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Marked move characters su ggestion
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:44:36 +0200

>On Wed 10 Sep 2003 (04:38 -0400), address@hidden wrote:
>> IMHO the marked move characters still don't look easy on the eye so how about
>> this suggestion:
>>
>> Checker play:     doubtful/bad/very bad  use:   p, pp, ppp
>> Cube action doubtful/bad/verybad          use:   c, cc, ccc
>>
>> It just looks so much easier to read  than !???!!!???  etc ;-)
>>
>> It's unfortunate that cube and checker start with the same letter !
>> If you think p isn't appropriate then suggest another letter.
>
>
>Should we just have a options and settings:
>
>set flag cube very bad C
>set flag cube bad      c
>set flag cube doubtful c!
>set flag chequer very bad P
>set flag chequer bad      p
>set flag chequer doubtful p!
>
>Or alternatively:
>
>set flags cube C c c!
>set flags chequer P p p!
>
>This allows users with other languages to make their own choices

Hmmm,this would basically make annotations unreadable acroos different
users, since sooner or later a "special" user will set the following :

cube very bad  D
cube bad       VB
cube doubtful  B

or any other unreadable permutation (most illogical first).

I have small preferences across different possibilities, but I do
think that a fixed one is better.

MaX.

P.S.

My 2c :

Ian's  : 62?? 13/7 13/11??
or     : 62   13/7 13/11 (??,??)  <-- (cube,chequer)
or     : 62   (??,??) 13/7 13/11







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]