[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fuel for the fire
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fuel for the fire |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:53:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:22:55AM +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:41:21AM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote
> >
> > Might be a silly idea,
>
> Hmm, this could be an excellent idea.
>
> > but perhaps what we need is an equivalent to
> > "confidence interval". I
>
> The error rate is calculated as the average error loss per "move". It's
> trivial to calculate the standard deviation and 95% confidence interval.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> For example,
>
> Error rate per decision: -0.012 (+/- 0.003)
>
> The conf. interval is -0.009 to -0.015, so the player will be rated
> Intermediate to Advanced. Will this confuse users?
One problem I forsee is that users might misinterprete such an interval
as the uncertainty in the evaluations instead of the statistical
uncertainty in the average.
Jørn
pgpxLaz0OE2l_.pgp
Description: PGP signature