Hi all, I've been away from this list for a while. Just
thought I'd post an update on ParlorBot's stats, after about
5 months in service running 0.13.0:
Number of samples : 15992
Lowest : 1856.69
Highest : 2154.10
Mean : 2005.42
Standard Deviation : 52.34
Again this is 2-ply play and cube decisions, "narrow" move
filters, 33% reduced.
Cheers,
-- Rod
On Monday 07 July 2003 12:00 pm, Rod Roark wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2003 10:40 am, Albert Silver wrote:
... GNU's attributed rating is supposedly based on the FIBS rating system
and is designed to give a rating that approximates what a user might get
at FIBS. However, it's self-attributed rating seems to be what
everything else is relative to and is at 2200. GNU does not have a 2200
rating at FIBS, not even by a margin. I think that lowering this to
2050, representing it's average, would make much more sense. As a
consequence, all its relative ratings should be lowered accordingly.
Here are the latest cumulative stats for ParlorBot, which
runs gnubg on FIBS with 2-ply checker play and cube
decisions, 33% reduced:
Number of samples : 3692 (i.e. number of rated matches played)
Lowest : 1880.71
Highest : 2120.74
Mean : 2002.35
Standard Deviation : 51.70
While the average rating used to be around 2030, there has
been a great deal of wandering from that. Also I suspect
that a few clever FIBSters have learned to take advantage of
the bot's less-than-perfect evaluation in back games and
holding games.
-- Rod
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg