[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background
From: |
Thomas Hauk |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:12:59 -0700 (MST) |
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Jim Segrave wrote:
> I'm not actually sure naming me as a key member is quite accurate
>
> I suppose I'm suggesting my name be dropped from that list, since a
> fair list would begin to sound like an Oscar winner's acceptance
> speech.
I took the list of names at
http://www.gnubg.org/team.shtml
that were along the top as "written by". I decided that would be the
fairest thing to do, since it's you guys (the team) that decided who was
principal contributors, and not myself. 8)
--
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
--Jamie Zawinski, in comp.lang.emacs
- [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Thomas Hauk, 2003/11/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Jim Segrave, 2003/11/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background,
Thomas Hauk <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Øystein Johansen, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Jim Segrave, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Thomas Hauk, 2003/11/12
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, David Montgomery, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Jim Segrave, 2003/11/13
Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNU Backgammon overview/background, Achim Mueller, 2003/11/11