bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Plays ranked in wrong order in rollout window


From: Ian Shaw
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Plays ranked in wrong order in rollout window
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:51:35 -0000

 

        From: Chris W.
        Sent: 25 February 2007 02:34


        cff> I interrupted and saved a rollout, then resumed it the next
day. After
        cff> letting it run for a few hours, I noticed that the display
had the plays
        cff> ranked in the wrong order. The play with the highest equity
(0.012) was
        cff> ranked 5th, while a play with a worse equity (-0.014) was
ranked 1st.
        cff> I've attached a screen print of the erroneous display, as
well as a copy
        cff> of the gnu file before I resumed the rollout. (Note: this
rollout has
        cff> been stopped, saved, and resumed several times. I can't say
for sure
        cff> whether this display problem occurred on the earlier
resumes, but I
        cff> don't believe it did.) I'm running the 0.16 - November 14
2006 build on
        cff> Windows XP.


        I too have noticed the same problem.  Attached is a rollout of a
nack position that illustrates the issue.


Chase,

Your screen-shot looks normal to me. Plays in the rollout window are not
sorted after every trial, so you often get them in the wrong order while
the rollout is in progress. When the rollout finishes and you OK the
wondow, they results do get sorted for the analyssi display. Is this
what you observed?

Chris,

You situation looks more unusual. Is this a copy from the analysis
screen of a completed rollout? If so, it looks like there is a problem.
The only time I have seen this before is when I have rolled out the
plays one-by-one in the CLI, rather than select them all and roll them
out simultaneously from the GUI. Can you confirm exactly what you did,
please?

Finally, readers of this mailing list much prefer that you post in plain
text, rather than HTML.

Cheers,
Ian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]