> >Sounds theoretically true. I tried a bit
to setup such a
> >situation but I didn't manage to get one. Anybody has one
> >example of an eval leading to a too good/take ?
"Øystein O. Johansen" <address@hidden>
wrote on 15/04/2008 14:53:35:
> > GNU Backgammon Position ID: tm0DAHB32w4AAA
> Match
ID : UQkgARAAKAAA
> +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ O:
gnubg
> | O |
O | O O O O O | 1 point
> | O |
O | O O O O O |
> | |
O | |
> | |
| |
> | |
| |
> v| |BAR|
|
9 point match
> | |
| |
> | |
| |
> | |
| X X X |
> | |
| X X X X X X | On roll
> | |
| X X X X X X | 5 points
> +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ X:
OJOHANS (Cube: 2)
>
>
>
> Cube analysis
> 2-ply cubeless MWC 93.06% (Money: +1.454)
> 0.860 0.699 0.036 - 0.140 0.000 0.000
> Cubeful equities:
> 1. No double 90.44%
> 2. Double, pass 87.75% ( -2.69%)
> 3. Double, take 85.97% ( -4.47%)
> Proper cube action: Too good to redouble, take
>
> -Øystein
Sven wrote:
> Yes, this one:
> Position ID: bdsBKgC27QwGAA
> Match ID: UQkgARAAKAAA
>
> /Svempa