bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fedora Core 4 Build Problem


From: Christian Anthon
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fedora Core 4 Build Problem
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:45:46 +0100

The crash was caused by a bug in the code, only visable when memory
mapping failed or was disabled. I've checked in a fix for your compile
problem and for the bug as well.

My own guide-line to when a system is too old is debian stable, but it
is possible that some or all of your problems are present on currently
supported rhel systems, and I believe we should support those as well
(if possible without too much code pollution). So send me a diff of
what you need to do, and I'll take a look.

Christian.



On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Thomas A. Moulton <address@hidden> wrote:
> It related to the bearoff database, once I removed those files it works, but
> naturally makes errors.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> tom
>
> Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
>>
>> Well... it was acting up and I played via tty and after a while got:
>>
>> Considering move...Segmentation fault
>>
>> I guess we removed too much code :)
>>
>>
>> Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok I was able to install the built version.
>>>
>>> What else should we do? (i do have write privs btw)
>>>
>>> Is my system that unique (aka old) that we can leave well enough alone?
>>>
>>> I assume the built version should work ok, right?
>>>
>>> tom
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Thomas A. Moulton <address@hidden>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes that is strange.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind of. It is a bug in old versions of autoconf. You can delete the
>>>> matching lines in configure.in if you need to run configure more than
>>>> once.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed them and rebuilt and then it failed on
>>>>>
>>>>> bearoff.h line 50 - GMappedFile seems to not be defined
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a data type, struct?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, it is an impolite way of telling you that you glib library is
>>>> too old. Try the attached patch, and we'll see how far we get.
>>>>
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]