[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:45:18 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 |
On 08/08/09 2:41 PM, "Michael Petch" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Didn't work for me either. Looking at the generated assembler it is clear
> one of the memory accesses of pm gets optimized away in the loop. The
> volatile keyword on pm works, and I believe is the best solution as well.
>
If this works for others, can I recommend a Windows release get generated as
well. Bgonliners (Keene specifically) were the first to believe there may be
an issue, and would be nice to get them a resolution.
Michael
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Louis Zulli, 2009/08/06
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Ingo Macherius, 2009/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Michael Petch, 2009/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Christian Anthon, 2009/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Michael Petch, 2009/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Getting gnubg to use all available cores, Louis Zulli, 2009/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Christian Anthon, 2009/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Christian Anthon, 2009/08/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Philippe Michel, 2009/08/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Michael Petch, 2009/08/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information,
Michael Petch <=
- Re : [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Massimiliano Maini, 2009/08/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: gnubg bug? Baseline Information, Christian Anthon, 2009/08/11