[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg's Cache and Plies > 3 - problem?
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg's Cache and Plies > 3 - problem? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:19:32 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 |
On 01/09/09 3:16 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Isn't the reduction code the Snowie-like thing, where you can decide
> to examine only a subset of the rolls ?
> E.g. 50% = only consier half of the possible rolls for analysis/rollout.
>
> If it's the case, I do think we can throw it away.
>
> For information, my Win builds have REDUCTION_CODE *not* defined.
>
On top of that, you can't use pruning if you use reduction. They are
mutually exclusive afaik.