Re: [Bug-gnubg] SGF questions

[Guido Flohr]

Hi,

On 04/20/2011 06:36 PM, Philippe Michel wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Guido Flohr wrote:
>> Say, the first three rolls are 66, 22, 31.  I could do it like this:
>>
>>     (
>>     ;GM[6]
>>     ;DI[66]CV[2]
>>     ;DI[22]CV[4]
>>     ;DI[31]
>>     )
>>
>> Or like this:
>>
>>     (
>>     ;GM[6]CV[4]
>>     ;DI[31]
>>     )
>>
>> Or even like this:
>>
>>     (
>>     ;GM[6]
>>     ;DI[31]CV[4]
>>     )
>>
>> The first option is likely to confuse the gnubg SGF parser, and maybe
>> mess up the move counting.  The other two possibilities will lose some
>> unimportant information.  What should I do?
> 
> The second choice is similar to what gnubg generates when it plays with
> automatic doubles, except that it needs a PL entry before DI or it can't
> parse it and fails with :

How can I activate automatic doubles in gnubg? I didn't find an option
for that.

Otherwise, yes, sure, I will add whatever properties gnubg wants.  They
were omitted for brevity.

Guido
-- 
Империя ООД                         | Imperia OOD
ул. „Княз-Борис-I“ № 86, София 1000 | ul. "Knyaz-Boris-I" № 86, Sofia
http://www.imperia.bg/