[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:31:12 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 04:37:57PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Perhaps what we should do is keep the files that are mastered in gnulib
> > under lgpl. And then keep a copy of all them under the gpl
> > (automatically updated of course). Then gnulib users can pick whichever
> > one they need.
> That sounds reasonable. We could have the lgpl copies under lib-lgpl,
> for example. I'd rather have the lib copies all be gpl'ed, though,
> for convenience.
Perhaps we can standardize the header in a way that is easily attacked
with sed. Then gnulibize (or whatever we called it) could have a --gpl
option which would take care of the convenience factor.
Everything else is nicely automated, why not this? =)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/24
Re: [Bug-gnulib] module maintainers, Karl Berry, 2003/01/24