[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch'
From: |
GOTO Masanori |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch' |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:30:14 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (UnebigoryĆmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:19:16 +0200,
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I'll submit an alternate patch to coreutils so that it works around
> > this glibc glitch. The simplest workaround is to not invoke utimes
> > when building with glibc; perhaps I can improve on that, but I don't
> > know.
>
> We don't have to condemn the coreutils always
> to use the inferior utime interface on glibc systems.
> Instead, I'm adding a configure-time test of utimes, so that
> if it works, coreutils will use it.
>
> Here's the C program it'll compile and run.
> So far it compiles and exits successfully on all systems listed
> except for the one with Debian libc6 version 2.3.2-1.
So I patched Jakub's modification for 2.3.2-3, ok?
Regards,
-- gotom
- [Bug-gnulib] utimes problem: linux libc/kernel header mismatch?, Jim Meyering, 2003/08/09
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch',
GOTO Masanori <=
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch', Paul Eggert, 2003/08/18
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch', GOTO Masanori, 2003/08/18
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch', Paul Eggert, 2003/08/18
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Bug#202243: glibc utimes glitch with coreutils 'touch', GOTO Masanori, 2003/08/26