[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:43:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:18:06PM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
> Does *anyone* still have SunOS 4? Maybe it's time not to care about it
> at all?
I have a SunOS 4 box, but it's in storage.
--
James Youngman.
CSSC Bug reporting page: http://sf.net/tracker/?group_id=8064&atid=108064
GNU Findutils bug reporting page: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=findutils
- [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Bruno Haible, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, James Youngman, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, James Youngman, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] utime.c patch for the !HAVE_UTIMES_NULL case, Jim Meyering, 2003/09/10