[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:28:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> unlocked-io (included implicitly by several modules): claims to be
>> thread unsafe.
>
> #define USE_UNLOCKED_IO 0
>
> should do the trick, isn't it?
Where should I put this? In config.h?
I believe it would work. OTOH, the unlocked-io package sounds to me
like something you should opt-in for, not opt-out from. So couldn't
packages that want the unlocked-io optimization go through extra work,
instead of forcing packages that want to be thread safe to go through
extra work?
- [Bug-gnulib] requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/20
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Paul Eggert, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Paul Eggert, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: requirements of 'unlocked-io' module, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/24