[Bug-gnulib] Re: memstr

[Simon Josefsson]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> How about this?
>
> Shouldn't this be looking for one block of memory inside another?
> That is, the function should accept two size arguments, as well as two
> pointers.  That's more general.

If so, I'm not sure the name "memstr" is appropriate any more.  I
think str(ing) imply zero terminated arrays.  Is there a better name?
One idea, inspired by strpos, is mempos, but I dunno.

Thanks.