[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:18:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > + if (hints &&
> > GNU coding style (section "Formatting Your Source Code") recommends
> > to put the operator && into the next line.
>
> I'm using "indent", which seem to miss that. Fixed manually.
The -bbo option. In your ~/.indent.pro file:
--break-before-boolean-operator
But this should be the default with GNU indent. From the manual for
version 2.2.9:
As of version 1.2, the default style of GNU `indent' is the GNU
style. Thus, it is no longer necessary to specify the option `-gnu' to
obtain this format, although doing so will not cause an error. Option
settings which correspond to the GNU style are:
-nbad -bap -nbc -bbo -bl -bli2 -bls -ncdb -nce -cp1 -cs -di2
-ndj -nfc1 -nfca -hnl -i2 -ip5 -lp -pcs -nprs -psl -saf -sai
-saw -nsc -nsob
Perhaps you have an opposing option in your ~/.indent.pro file?
Bob
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Bruno Haible, 2004/11/09
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/09
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Bruno Haible, 2004/11/09
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Bruno Haible, 2004/11/09
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Bruno Haible, 2004/11/10
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo,
Bob Proulx <=
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getaddrinfo, Simon Josefsson, 2004/11/09