[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:27:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
the message I'm replying to, which is archived as
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2004-12/msg00118.html
shouldn't get forgot, especially now, when we have the small limit, so
it is relatively safe to use alloc.
I refreshed Bruno's patch, so that it applies to current CVS; it is
attached to this mail.
See the original Bruno's patch for explanation.
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, (continued)
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/18
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Bruno Haible, 2004/12/18
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/19
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Bruno Haible, 2004/12/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/22
[bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Bruno Haible, 2004/12/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Stepan Kasal, 2004/12/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Stepan Kasal, 2004/12/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/22