[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strnlen.h needed?
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: strnlen.h needed? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:45:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> but now there is a comment in both strnlen.c and
> strnlen.h. Should we remove one of them?
No. We keep the comment in strnlen.h because that's where most users will
look at (in case they are on a machine where "man strnlen" doesn't work).
And the one in the .c file, we keep it to minimize differences with glibc
source code.
Bruno