Re: getdelim doesn't set errno on failure?

[Simon Josefsson]

Derek Price <address@hidden> writes:

> Whoa!  Why fix the documentation?  Why not simply return EOF on EOF, as
> currently described?  The attached simple patch fixes this in
> lib/getdelim.c, matching the behavior to that displayed by my local
> glibc.  This fix has been tested on at least one platform which was
> prevoiusly looping indefinitely around code that expected (and has
> expected for years) a -1 return to signify EOF.
>
> 2005-08-31  Derek Price  <address@hidden>
>
>         * getdelim.c (getdelim): Return EOF on EOF.
>         Reported by Larry Jones <address@hidden>.

Look fine, applied!