[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_LIBSOURCES considered harmful
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: AC_LIBSOURCES considered harmful |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:40:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) |
Salut Alexandre!
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>>>>"BH" == Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> BH> Also, do you have an idea about the release date of automake-1.10?
>
> CVS Automake depends on CVS Autoconf. (No it doesn't depend on
> CVS Libtool nor CVS M4.) So it could be released as soon as
> Autoconf 2.60 is released. One month after 2.60 would be a
> safer bet.
My bad. I was thinking about the need for CVS M4's in-script search
path modification to get rid of aclocal. To correct my earlier
assertions: some future version of Autoconf/Automake won't need the
aclocal hack anymore, and *that* will need M4-2.0.
M4-2.0 is still blocked until Libtool-2.0 releases btw.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature