[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> maybe someone could say if
> the license would be acceptable for a gnulib module first.
Yes, that Inner Net license is acceptable. The short justification is
that it's acceptable for glibc so it's OK for GNU projects anyway.
The long justification, if you're interested, is that once you assume
the LGPL it imposes no real restrictions other than what the LGPL
itself imposes so it's logically equivalent to the empty set (other
than the fact that that the notice itself must be preserved, which is
OK as per the LGPL). As usual I should say that I am not a lawyer and
this is not legal advice.
- Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2005/09/15
- Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/15
- Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Bruno Haible, 2005/09/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2005/09/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Derek Price, 2005/09/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2005/09/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Derek Price, 2005/09/15
- Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/15
- Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2005/09/15
- Re: Incomplete getaddrinfo module, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/15