[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:08:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Peter O'Gorman" <address@hidden> writes:
> > getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
> > alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
>
> Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
Me too.
> How about this proposal?
>
> * Change the progname module to use the BSD getprogname naming
> convention. No sense reinventing the wheel. That way, programs can
> simply use the system-defined functions on BSD.
>
> * Rewrite the other gnulib code to use the new convention.
>
> * Ask gnulib users to switch to the new convention.
Yes, that's the most sensible thing to do. If there are no objections,
I will change the 'progname' module accordingly.
Bruno
- Re: use of program_name, (continued)
- Re: use of program_name, Dave Love, 2006/01/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: use of program_name, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/09
- use of -fno-common on Darwin (was: use of program_name), Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/01/10
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/11
- Re: use of -fno-common on Darwin, James Youngman, 2006/01/10
- Re: getprogname, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/11
- Re: getprogname, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/11
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: use of program_name, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/09
- Re: use of program_name, James Youngman, 2006/01/05