Re: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32)

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32)

From:	Karl Berry
Subject:	Re: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32)
Date:	Fri, 19 May 2006 12:19:41 -0500

Hi Ralf,

            * doc/standards.texi (System Portability): Spell out `free BSD
            variants', instead of using the term `*BSD'.

Before I bother rms with this, can you please explain to me the
objection to "*BSD"?  I'd never heard that before.  NetBSD and OpenBSD
don't like being lumped together?

Thanks,
karl

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Cygwin && WIN32, Bruno Haible, 2006/05/18
- Re: Cygwin && WIN32, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Cygwin && WIN32, Bruno Haible, 2006/05/19
    - standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32), Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/19
    - Re: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32), Karl Berry <=
    - Re: standards.texi language cleanup, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/19
    - Re: standards.texi language cleanup, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
    - Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32), Bruno Haible, 2006/05/19
    - Re: standards.texi language cleanup, Simon Josefsson, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Cygwin && WIN32, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Cygwin && WIN32, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/19

Prev by Date: Re: Cygwin && WIN32
Next by Date: Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32
Previous by thread: standards.texi language cleanup (was: Cygwin && WIN32)
Next by thread: Re: standards.texi language cleanup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread