[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoreconf --install vs. gnulib-tool
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: autoreconf --install vs. gnulib-tool |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:35:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530) |
Hi Eric,
Eric Blake wrote:
> I was wondering if it would be worth teaching gnulib-tool about all the files
> that `autoreconf --install' normally installs, and then updating those files
> from gnulib's repository as part of `gnulib-tool --update'. That way, ad hoc
> rules in various Makefile.maint that try to wget the various files from
> various
> upstream sources, could then be simplified to just updating the gnulib CVS
> checkout and getting the latest version of the various files directly from
> gnulib. And by having gnulib track the list of files, there is less
> maintainence burden on keeping lists up-to-date within Makefile.maint of a
> particular project.
That sounds like a splendid idea to me!
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://trac.azazil.net/projects/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature