Re: Portablity bug in base64.c

[Paul Eggert]

address@hidden (Larry Jones) writes:

> The cost of the change is exceeding low

I think it's more that we're worried about having to cater to other
silly compiler incompatibilities with C89.  There are so many of them...

But to save time on this I installed your patch (though I used _
rather than xx as the local variable, just to be ornery :-).