[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib taking over libobjs? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:09:30 +0200 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
...
>> It passed "make distcheck" with only one additional kludge.
>> The above mistakenly added lib/tmpfile-safer.c to the list,
>> even though coreutils doesn't use the file.
>> It was pulled in due to this unused macro in stdio-safer.m4:
>>
>> AC_DEFUN([gl_TMPFILE_SAFER],
>> [
>> AC_LIBOBJ([tmpfile-safer])
>> ])
>
> Well, the 'tmpfile-safer' module uses this macro.
It is unused by coreutils, hence tmpfile-safer.c should
not be distributed.
>> I would hate to institutionalize a process that requires us to
>> maintain all of these names in two places -- even temporarily.
> Wait until tomorrow...
Ok. I can wait a few hours :-)
That's good to hear.
I presume you will soon back out your 3000-line change
that just added all of those EXTRA_DIST += ... lines.
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Eric Blake, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/13
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/13
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/05
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/05