Re: renaming obstack_free

[Paul Eggert]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> I propose this one. Paul, do you think you can push that into glibc?

I think glibc would take that change, yes.  I'll put it on my list of
things to do.

>       * lib/obstack.h (_obstack_free): New macro. Declare instead of
>       obstack_free.

That doesn't quite follow the namespace rules for glibc, since
_obstack_free is part of the user's name space for macros.  But if we
uniformly substitute __obstack_free for _obstack_free, and omit the
change's last hunk, then the change should be OK for glibc.