Re: [bug-gnulib] Missing dependency in allocsa

[Charles Wilson]

Bruno Haible wrote:

> If you got malloc/realloc #defined, it is certainly because you used
> the modules 'malloc'/'realloc'.

Or I blindly accepted the recommendations of autoscan-2.60, which inserted

AC_FUNC_MALLOC
AC_FUNC_REALLOC

into configure.scan, and I didn't notice.  D'oh!

> And I don't understand your argumentation about LGPL vs. GPL, since there
> is no license problem in the 'allocsa' module in the first place.

Right. There is no problem. Since I *thought* allocsa needed to depend 
on malloc/realloc, I was emphasizing that the new dependence would not 
require a licensing change on allocsa.

But that's all moot.  Operator error -- sorry for the noise.

--
Chuck