[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:10:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> There's gotta be a better way.
>
> I installed the following
Look fine. Thanks!
> I prefer macros like "static_inline" and
> "long_double" when defining macros that stand for their standard
> counterparts like "static inline" and "long double".
Well, I agree that 'long_double' and 'unsigned_long_long' look prettier than
'LONG_DOUBLE' or 'UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG'. I used an uppercase macro because it
stands sometimes for 'static inline' and sometimes for empty.
Bruno
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc (was: Re: C++ support (2)), Bruno Haible, 2006/11/01
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/01
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/02
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/02
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/07
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/07
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Paul Eggert, 2006/11/07
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/08
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] xmalloc, xnmalloc, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/07