[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable)
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:02:50 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> I didn't see this show up on bug-gnulib, nor in the list queue, so I took
> the liberty of resending it...
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:13:36 -0600
> From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad AT users.sourceforge.net>
> ...
> Ok. Using the latest snapshot Eric provided me with, m4 fails to build
> on Tandem NSK/OSS. Using the above, *plus* this patch:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-10/msg00140.html
> both 'make' and 'make check' succeed.
As Bruno mentioned in
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-11/msg00092.html>,
he'd rather not head down this path due to the high cost/benefit
ratio. Even if M4 builds with the abovementioned patch, the approach
will likely cause runtime misbehaviors -- almost certainly in
coreutils, and quite possibly also in M4.
Perhaps there's a better way. In
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-11/msg00069.html>
I asked Matthew Woehlke why the patch was actually needed -- as it's
not 100% clear to me -- and that hasn't been followed up on yet.
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Paul Eggert, 2006/11/09
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Eric Blake, 2006/11/16
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable),
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Bruno Haible, 2006/11/17
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/21
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Paul Eggert, 2006/11/21
- Re: coreutils-6.4 released (stable), Matthew Woehlke, 2006/11/21