Re: coreutils-6.5: yet another C89 problem

[Matthew Woehlke]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
> > This will keep me from releasing decl-after-stmt code in coreutils/src:
>
> This inspired me to try harder for an automated check for departures
> from C89. [snip]

Thanks, both! Since this is the most common C89 deviation (and one that 
is usually purely cosmetic and avoided with few or no adverse effects), 
I think this will help keep gnulib/coreutils c89 compatible (or at least 
compatible with most non-c99 compilers).

--
Matthew
This message will self destruct in five millennia.